Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2013

Browse To Your Heart's Content?

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

The Supreme Court has recently come to the provisional conclusion that unauthorised browsing of copyright-protected material on the internet will not infringe copyright in that material.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

In a recent decision, the Supreme Court has come to the provisional conclusion that unauthorised browsing of copyright-protected material on the internet will not infringe copyright in that material. 

The Court has, however, asked the CJEU (Court of Justice of the European Union, the EU's highest court) to confirm that it has come to the correct decision because it involves the construction of Article 5(1) of the EU Copyright Directive and has consequences for rights-holders, internet users and intermediaries across the EU. 

In coming to its conclusion, the Court was clearly heavily influenced by what it felt was the acceptable result for society: namely, that many millions of unwitting internet users should not be held liable for copyright infringement simply by browsing copyright-protected material on the internet – just as they would not be held liable for merely viewing such material in its physical form or on a television screen in a private home. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from