Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2018

A Huawei v Samsung Summary

The Intermediate People's Court in Shenzhen recently ruled in favour of Huawei against Samsung in a case involving two standard-essential patents (SEP) owned by Huawei...

United KingdomIntellectual Property

The Intermediate People's Court in Shenzhen recently ruled in favour of Huawei against Samsung in a case involving two standard-essential patents (SEP) owned by Huawei, after finding that Samsung infringed the two patents and had "maliciously delayed negotiations".

This decision is the latest in an ongoing saga of patent disputes between the Asian tech giants, which have been filing lawsuits against each other in China and the US since May 2016. In the ruling, Samsung was ordered to immediately stop the manufacturing and sales of their infringing products and to pay a small court fee, although it is not clear which of the phone models are affected.

Two main issues were considered in detail by the court during an 18-day trial - the first relates to whether the two patents owned by Huawei are essential to the 4G standard, and the other being whether FRAND was breached by either of the parties during the negotiation discussions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from