Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2021

Subsidence Mitigation: The Legal Principles

Tree root subsidence claims are often long running and expensive for insurers, not to mention the impact they have on the policyholder. This is especially so when underpinning of the...

United KingdomInsurance

Subsidence: mitigating insurer's outlay and maximising recovery prospects.

Tree root subsidence claims are often long running and expensive for insurers, not to mention the impact they have on the policyholder. This is especially so when underpinning of the affected property is required to reinstate stability. Where underpinning is required, insurer's outlay can often run into the tens or hundreds of thousands of pounds. Frustratingly, these costs can invariably be avoided by securing swift removal of the implicated vegetation; however, where the tree is not owned by the policyholder, swift removal is often elusive and insurer's best option is to seek to recover the costs of underpinning from the third party tree owner.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from