Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 NOVEMBER 2008

Natural Catastrophes - The Causation Conundrum

When a disaster strikes, the insurance industry is expected to respond quickly and decisively. Unfortunately, the factual chaos which often results is frequently accompanied by coverage issues.

United KingdomInsurance
Yvonne Jefferies
Yvonne Jefferies
James Thomas
James Thomas

When a disaster strikes, the insurance industry is expected to respond quickly and decisively. Unfortunately, the factual chaos which often results is frequently accompanied by coverage issues.

A recurring issue is causation due to the chain of events leading to loss, for example, an earthquake which leads to a tsunami which leads to flooding.

Determining cause of loss can be a conundrum due to the way in which the law approaches causation. We summarise below relevant principles plus contractual drafting tips. The starting point is that an insurer is only liable for losses caused by an insured peril. However, a loss may have a range of possible causes depending on how far back in time one goes. As one judge put it in relation to an insurance contract, "...the chain of causation recedes infinitely into the past. The draftsman must have intended to stop somewhere: and that place must be the point at which an event ceases to be a cause of the loss, and becomes merely

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from