Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2009

Liability Of Company Auditors

Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge UK LLP
Explore more from Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge UK LLP

The Court of Appeal's unanimous judgment in Moore Stephens (a firm) v Stone & Rolls Ltd (in liquidation) is a welcome decision for auditors and their insurers.

United KingdomInsurance
Laurence Harris
Laurence Harris
Emma Richardson
Emma Richardson

The Court of Appeal's unanimous judgment in Moore Stephens (a firm) v Stone & Rolls Ltd (in liquidation)1 is a welcome decision for auditors and their insurers. It confirms that an auditor is not liable for losses that arise from liabilities incurred by a company towards third parties caused by a company's fraud, where the fraud is perpetrated by the "sole directing mind" of the company.

The longstanding legal principle of ex turpi causa non oritur actio (the ex turpi principle), which means that "no court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action on an immoral or illegal act"2 , was the subject of much discussion in the Judgment of the Court of Appeal delivered on 18 June 2008, which overturned the High Court's decision. The case has received a great deal of publicity as it is one of the first substantial cases in England and Wales in which the Claimant, the liquidator, was financed by a third party funder.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from