Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MAY 2018

Insurer's Duty - Ramsook v Crossley

Privy Council considers insurer's duty when conducting defence on behalf of an insured

United KingdomInsurance

Privy Council considers insurer's duty when conducting defence on behalf of an insured

The insured was driving when she was involved in a road accident (in Trinidad and Tobago) and was sued by her passenger. Her motor insurance policy contained the following clause: "Representation: No admission, offer, promise, or payment shall be made by or on behalf of the Insured without the consent of the Company which shall be entitled, if it so desires, to take over and conduct in the Insured's name the defence or settlement of any claim for indemnity or damages or otherwise and shall have full discretion in the conduct of any proceedings and in the settlement of any claim ...."

The insurers admitted liability without informing the insured (who did not believe that she had been negligent). After judgment was entered against the insured (for an amount significantly in excess of the policy limit, insureds only being required to take out insurance of up to USD 1 million in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from