Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2014

Insurance And Reinsurance Weekly Update - 7 October 2014

The claimant argued that costs should not be awarded against him because the defendant had recovered no more than it would have done had it accepted the claimant’s earlier Calderbank offer.

United KingdomInsurance

Welcome to the thirty-sixth edition of Clyde & Co's (Re)insurance and litigation caselaw weekly updates for 2014

A summary of recent developments in insurance, reinsurance and litigation law.

This week's caselaw

Coward v Phaestos

A case on Calderbank offers and whether an offer must be beaten in monetary terms.

Calderbank offers and whether an offer must be beaten in monetary terms.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/1256.html

After the claimant lost at trial, he argued that costs should not be awarded against him because the defendant had recovered no more than it would have done had it accepted the claimant's earlier Calderbank offer. The judge at first instance held that the defendant had done significantly better at trial and the Court of Appeal agreed with that decision. In reaching that conclusion, it also held that although the Calderbank offer was in terms which were capable of acceptance, so as to give rise to a contract, the judge

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from