Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 FEBRUARY 2018

Euro Pools v RSA: Applying Kajima Restrictively

Over the years, issues of attachment and which policy responds has been a great source of contention in professional and financial lines, with issues around notification frequently being the source of such disputes.

United KingdomInsurance

Over the years, issues of attachment and which policy responds has been a great source of contention in professional and financial lines, with issues around notification frequently being the source of such disputes. Liability policies are particularly susceptible to notification disputes due to the claims made nature of such policies, providing cover for claims which are made against the insured in the policy year, even though the alleged negligence may have occurred in earlier years.

Whether a current or previous policy responds to the claim can centre on whether the claim arose out of circumstances previously notified. However, where a problem develops over time, ascertaining whether an earlier notification actually gave rise to the ultimate claim can be difficult to assess. This was one of the issues to be decided in the recent case of Euro Pools Plc (In Administration) v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc [2018] EWHC 46 (Comm) (we touch on the other issues to be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from