Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2010

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance: Problems and Pitfalls

ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF INCORPORATION is to absorb and contain liability within the corporate shell: the so-called corporate veil, behind which directors used to feel reasonably safe.

United KingdomInsurance
Jeremy Hill
Jeremy Hill
Christopher Henley
Christopher Henley

This article was previously published by The In-House Lawyer.

ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF INCORPORATION is to absorb and contain liability within the corporate shell: the so-called corporate veil, behind which directors used to feel reasonably safe. However, a director can in certain circumstances be personally liable to the company, its liquidator, its shareholders, third parties and any of its regulators, such as the Financial Services Authority (FSA), Health and Safety Executive, Information Commissioner, Pensions Regulator or Office of Fair Trading. Directors may also incur considerable expense in defending claims, investigations or even extradition and, in addition to the recent potential extension of litigation by derivative action, may face claims arising out of the tougher regulation brought into force as a result of the recession.1 Even when the director is convinced that the allegations made are completely unfounded, the costs of defending their position can be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from