Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 NOVEMBER 2018

CJEU Rejects (The Other) Brexit Case As Inadmissible

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Today everyone's focus is on the CJEU hearing taking place in the Wightman case. However, yesterday CJEU published its judgment in another Brexit challenge - Shindler and Ors v Council of the European Union.

United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector

Today everyone's focus is on the CJEU hearing taking place in the Wightman case. However, yesterday CJEU published its judgment in another Brexit challenge - Shindler and Ors v Council of the European Union.

Under Article 50 TFEU, read together with Article 218(3), once the UK gave notification of its intention to leave the EU, the Council had to authorise the Commission to commence negotiations on the withdrawal agreement.

Mr Shindler sought to challenge that authorisation by the Council.

His case was made up of several strands, including the suggestion that the Council's decision served to endorse or ratify the UK's notification of intention to withdraw. Mr Shindler argued that the notification was flawed as it was not founded upon the votes of UK citizens who had lived outside the UK for more than 15 years and who were therefore ineligible to vote in the referendum in 2016, or to elect the MPs who passed the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from