Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2017

Guarantees: Strict Compliance Is Not Strictly Necessary

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

A recent case has highlighted one of the key differences between guarantees and letters of credit: that the doctrine of strict compliance applies to letters of credit but not to guarantees.

United KingdomFinance and Banking

A recent case has highlighted one of the key differences between guarantees and letters of credit: that the doctrine of strict compliance applies to letters of credit but not to guarantees. However, that doesn't mean that a demand under a guarantee can take whatever form the presenter chooses. Below, we have identified the key messages from this case that you may come across in practice.

The decision in MUR Joint Ventures BV ('MUR') v Compagnie Monegasque De Banque (the 'Bank') [2016] EWHC 3107

In this case, a demand guarantee had been provided by the Bank to MUR.  Two demands for payment were sent to the Bank, which were rejected on the grounds that they failed to meet three of the payment criteria, namely;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from