Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2026

Examining The Upper Tribunal's Decision In Odey v FCA

Mishcon de Reya LLP
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Contributor
Mishcon de Reya LLP

Mishcon de Reya LLP

Founded by Lord Mishcon in 1937, in a one-room office in Brixton, Mishcon de Reya now employs over...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mishcon de Reya LLP

Enforcement Watch marks its fiftieth edition milestone, reflecting on sixteen years of tracking regulatory enforcement trends since its launch. How has the landscape of financial conduct regulation evolved from early promises of tougher action to today's enforcement reality?

United KingdomFinance and Banking

In brief

  • The Upper Tribunal upheld the FCA's decision to ban Crispin Odey from the financial services industry, finding that he lacked integrity by removing OAM executive committees that were investigating his conduct.
  • While the Tribunal upheld the FCA's findings, it reduced the financial penalty from £1.84 million to £1.53 million, partly reflecting Mr Odey's cooperation with the regulator.
  • The judgment contains strong criticism of Mr Odey's evidence, including his lack of candour, insight and contrition.
  • The case was decided as a corporate governance and integrity matter, not a non-financial misconduct case, although it highlights issues that may arise under the FCA's new non-financial misconduct regime.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from