Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2005

Actuaries’ duties to third parties

A recent case has considered the extent to which advisers owe a duty of care to third parties who rely on their advice.

United KingdomFinance and Banking
Daniel Shaw
Daniel Shaw

A recent case has considered the extent to which advisers owe a duty of care to third parties who rely on their advice.

When an adviser is sued by a client for negligent advice, the client is relying on a contractual relationship with the adviser. However, when a third party who claims to have relied on the advice sues the adviser, the position is more complicated. So when is a third party entitled to rely on such advice?

The recent case of Precis v Mercer is the latest in a long line of legal cases on this issue. The Court’s decision in this case might come as a (small) relief to the actuarial profession, and advisers in general, and will also be of interest to trustees of pension schemes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from