Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 APRIL 2019

Confiscation: A Question Of Judgement?

BCL Solicitors LLP
BCL Solicitors LLP
Contributor
BCL Solicitors LLP

BCL Solicitors LLP

BCL Solicitors is a market leading firm specialising in domestic and international corporate and...

View firm profile
Explore more from BCL Solicitors LLP

A high-level review of confiscation law may hold the promise of real change.

United KingdomCriminal Law

The Law Commission of England and Wales is consulting on changes to the regime in Part 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ('POCA') for making confiscation orders against defendants convicted of acquisitive crime. Though there is general agreement that the regime has serious problems, there is a divergence of views about what those problems are.

From the perspective of policy-makers and the media, the problems of the regime are largely about enforcement. Although courts regularly make orders in the sum of many millions of pounds, in practice those sums are often not recovered, with the implication that they are stashed away somewhere offshore, or have been comprehensively spent by the offenders by the time the order is made. Notably, the last set of changes made to the regime (in 2015) were largely aimed at tackling these problems, with a lower threshold to restrain suspects' assets pending confiscation, and higher default sentences for those who fail to pay.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from