Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 SEPTEMBER 2013

Tests For Whether There Is A Binding Agreement

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Mehboob and the other Plaintiffs were travel companies in dispute with PIA about payment of commission.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

Mehboob Travel Limited & Others and Pakistan International Airline Corp QBD

Mehboob and the other Plaintiffs were travel companies in dispute with PIA about payment of commission. They entered into negotiations to settle the dispute. A "memorandum of understanding" was signed by PIA and two of the claimants. PIA submitted that the MOU was a binding contract and that all the claimants had been bound by actual or apparent authority.

Not surprisingly, the High Court rejected the claim. There is no full judgment, but the case note provides a useful list of matters to be borne in mind in determining the issue:

  • whether there was a binding contract was not a question of the subjective state of mind of the parties, but what they had objectively agreed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from