Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JANUARY 2026

Standard Forms And Interpretation Norms

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The UK Supreme Court has ruled on the interpretation of clauses in a standard form JCT Design and Build Contract. For the construction industry, the case is useful for illuminating the meaning of certain ambiguous JCT Design and Build clauses.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

The UK Supreme Court has ruled on the interpretation of clauses in a standard form JCT Design and Build Contract. For the construction industry, the case is useful for illuminating the meaning of certain ambiguous JCT Design and Build clauses. However, more generally, the case is interesting for the Supreme Court's comments on the interpretation of industry-wide standard form contracts.

Missed payments

Under a contract for Providence to carry out building works for Hexagon, Hexagon had to make interim payments. Hexagon missed a payment, but paid in full within a cure period. Hexagon then missed another payment, and Providence purported to terminate the contract in exercise of its rights under a clause allowing it to terminate for certain repeated defaults by Hexagon.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from