Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2017

Challenging Exclusion Clauses Under UCTA: A Cautionary Tale

It also highlights the importance of identifying potential areas of risk under a contract and considering how these should be covered by insurance.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law
Perran Jervis
Perran Jervis

The Technology and Construction Court has recently held that an exclusion clause purporting to exclude any claim in negligence was reasonable under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA).

The decision provides useful clarification on the circumstances under which a broadly-drafted exclusion clause might be considered to be reasonable even if a part of it is deemed invalid under UCTA. It also highlights the importance of identifying potential areas of risk under a contract and considering how these should be covered by insurance.

Goodlife Foods Limited v Hall Fire Protection Limited: the facts

Goodlife, a producer of vegetarian meals, entered into a contract with Hall Fire for the design, supply, installation and commissioning of a fire suppression system at Goodlife's food production factory. In 2012, a fire broke out at the premises which led to property damage and business interruption losses of over £6 million.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from