Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 APRIL 2010

To Rule B or Not to Rule B

Al Tamimi & Company
Al Tamimi & Company
Contributor
Al Tamimi & Company

Al Tamimi & Company

With a regional presence of 17 offices across 10 countries, Al Tamimi & Company stands as a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Al Tamimi & Company

Unfortunately for maritime litigants around the world, the US Courts have recently determined that it is no longer going to be as effective.

United Arab EmiratesTransport
Corin Ricketts
Corin Ricketts

Unfortunately for maritime litigants around the world, the US Courts have recently determined that it is no longer going to be as effective.

The Development of Rule B Attachments

The transient nature of international shipping and marine commerce has encouraged the evolution of mechanisms unique to Admiralty and Maritime law for ensuring the availability of sufficient security for prospective claims against the carrier and, to a less marked extent, against charterers and/ or cargo interests.

These mechanisms, sought on an ex parte basis, are legitimately employed to secure and preserve assets against which any Judgment or Award can then be enforced; they are also less scrupulously used to apply pressure on or exert leverage against an intransigent party in order to stimulate and expedite settlement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from