Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2026

Turkish Courts And Artificial Intelligence — Part I: Istanbul Commercial Court Expressly Discloses Use Of AI In Drafting Reasoned Judgment

Paksoy
Paksoy
Contributor
Paksoy

Paksoy

Paksoy is an independent full-service law firm in Istanbul focused on helping clients in a wide...

View firm profile
Explore more from Paksoy

The case arose from a consultancy agreement concluded in 2015 between a Netherlands-domiciled consultancy firm and an Istanbul-based Turkish joint-stock company.

TurkeyTechnology

Background: the underlying dispute and enforcement proceedings

The case arose from a consultancy agreement concluded in 2015 between a Netherlands-domiciled consultancy firm and an Istanbul-based Turkish joint-stock company. Under the agreement, the claimant undertook to provide consultancy services for an eye clinic the defendant intended to open in the Netherlands, in return for a total fee of approximately EUR 300k payable in two equal instalments. The defendant paid the first instalment but refused to pay the second on various grounds.

The claimant brought a claim before the Amsterdam courts pursuant to the jurisdiction clause in the agreement. The Amsterdam court found in the claimant’s favour, ordering the defendant to pay the principal sum, a contractual penalty and litigation costs. The defendant’s counterclaim was dismissed. The judgment was upheld on appeal by the Amsterdam Court of Appeal and became final.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from