Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2025

The Competent Court For Granting Interim Relief Following An Enforcement Decision

Baysal & Demir
Baysal & Demir
Contributor
Baysal & Demir

Baysal & Demir

Baysal & Demir is an international law firm committed to excellence. The firm was founded by senior...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baysal & Demir

The enforcement of foreign court judgments and arbitral awards in Turkey is contingent upon an enforcement decision to be rendered pursuant to Articles 50 et seq. of Law No. 5718 on International Private and Procedural Law ("PIPL").

TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
  1. Introduction

The enforcement of foreign court judgments and arbitral awards in Turkey is contingent upon an enforcement decision to be rendered pursuant to Articles 50 et seq. of Law No. 5718 on International Private and Procedural Law ("PIPL"). While finality is generally not a prerequisite for the enforcement of foreign judgments, a distinct legal framework applies to enforcement decisions themselves. Specifically, the mere acceptance of an enforcement request by the court of first instance does not suffice; under Article 57(2) of PIPL, the enforcement decision must attain finality before the foreign judgment can be executed.

Until the enforcement decision regarding a foreign court judgment or arbitral award becomes final, applications for interim measures and provisional attachments play a critical role in preserving the creditor's rights. Turkish law imposes no temporal limitation on when such protective measures may be requested; they may be sought at

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from