Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 SEPTEMBER 2025

Dissolution Of Partnership Case (Izale-i Şüyu Case)

Uluturk Attorney Partnership
Explore more from Uluturk Attorney Partnership

In cases where there is shared or joint ownership, in other words, joint ownership, it is possible to terminate this ownership relationship and switch to individual ownership with an agreement between the stakeholders (partners).

TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Nisa Saraç
Nisa Saraç
Author LinkedIn connections

What is a Dissolution of Partnership Case?

In cases where there is shared or joint ownership, in other words, joint ownership, it is possible to terminate this ownership relationship and switch to individual ownership with an agreement between the stakeholders (partners). This method is called consensual sharing and requires the unanimity of all stakeholders. However, if even one of the stakeholders does not consent to the agreement, it becomes mandatory to file a lawsuit for dissolution of the partnership.

Is Mediation Mandatory in a Dissolution of Partnership Case?

As of September 1, 2023, it has become mandatory to go to mediation before applying to court in cases of dissolution of partnership. In cases to be filed after this date, it is necessary to apply to the mediator before applying to the court. Otherwise, lawsuits filed without an application for mediation will be dismissed due to lack of cause of action. If there is no agreement during the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

The Competence-Competence Principle

The competence-competence principle grants arbitral tribunals the authority to determine their own jurisdiction, including questions about the validity and scope of arbitration agreements. This article examines how Turkish law implements this fundamental arbitration doctrine through statutory provisions and judicial precedent, analyzing the balance between arbitral autonomy and judicial oversight in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kesikli Law Firm
Kesikli Law Firm
Article

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In Turkey 2026

This article examines the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in Turkey. It considers finality, reciprocity, jurisdiction, public policy, service, documentary requirements, security and the relationship between enforcement permission and actual collection. The discussion distinguishes foreign judgments from arbitral awards and from decisions eligible for a separate administrative registration route.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Dispute Resolution In Türkiye 2026

This article examines litigation, arbitration and mediation as distinct but connected methods of resolving cross-border disputes involving Türkiye. It considers jurisdiction, service, security for foreign claimants, arbitral consent, institutional procedures, mandatory mediation and the enforcement of outcomes. The statutory and treaty framework is read alongside the judicial authorities cited in the manuscript.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Inheritance Fraud Lawsuits: Legal Nature, Requirements, And Litigation Process

Inheritance fraud (muris muvazaası) is one of the most common inheritance-related disputes in Turkish legal practice. It typically arises when a deceased person (the decedent) transfers real property to one heir by disguising what is, in reality, a gratuitous transfer (gift) as a sale or a contract of maintenance until death, with the intention of depriving the remaining heirs of their inheritance rights. Although such transactions appear legally valid on their face, they do not reflect the parties' true intentions and are therefore evaluated under the legal principles governing sham transactions (muvazaa).
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office