Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2017

Challenging Decisions Of The Regional Courts Of Appeal

Erdem & Erdem Law
Explore more from Erdem & Erdem Law

By the inauguration of the Regional Courts of Appeal ("RCA") on July 20th, 2016, a change has been made from the two-tier appellate review system to one that is three-tier.

TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Tilbe Birengel
Tilbe Birengel
Author LinkedIn connections

Introduction

By the inauguration of the Regional Courts of Appeal ("RCA") on July 20th, 2016, a change has been made from the two-tier appellate review system to one that is three-tier. Accordingly, the Courts of First Instance ("CFI") decisions given prior to July 20th, 2016 will be subject to the appellate articles of the abrogated Civil Procedure Code1 To the contrary, the CFI decisions given as of July 20th, 2016 will be subject to the appellate articles that are in effect in the Civil Procedure Code2 ("CPC"). This article covers the substantial parts of the three-tier appellate system and its diverging parts from the former system.

The Decisions of the RCA That Can Be Subject to the Review of the CoA

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

The Competence-Competence Principle

The competence-competence principle grants arbitral tribunals the authority to determine their own jurisdiction, including questions about the validity and scope of arbitration agreements. This article examines how Turkish law implements this fundamental arbitration doctrine through statutory provisions and judicial precedent, analyzing the balance between arbitral autonomy and judicial oversight in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kesikli Law Firm
Kesikli Law Firm
Article

Uyap’taki Okundu Kaydı Kanuni Süreleri Başlatır Mı?

Türk usul hukukunda genel ilke, kanunda aksi öngörülmedikçe, usule ilişkin sürelerin tebliğ ile başlamasıdır. Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu (HMK), İdari Yargılama Usulü Kanunu ve çeşitli diğer kanunlar uyarınca, taraflara yönelik usul işlemlerine ilişkin kanuni süreler, kararın veya ilgili işlemin usulüne uygun şekilde tebliğ edildiği tarihten itibaren işlemeye başlar.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kolcuoğlu Demirkan Koçaklı Attorneys at Law
Kolcuoğlu Demirkan Koçaklı Attorneys at Law
Article

Usulsüz Tebligat Nedeniyle Kesinleşen İcra Takibinde Şikâyet Yolu

Ödeme veya icra emrinin borçluya usulüne uygun biçimde tebliğ edilmesi, icra takibindeki sürelerin başlaması ve takibin kesinleşmesi bakımından belirleyicidir. Borçlu tebligattan haberdar olmadan itiraz süresi geçmiş sayılırsa banka hesapları, alacakları, taşınırları veya taşınmazları üzerinde haciz işlemleri başlatılabilir. Böyle bir dosyada öncelikle tebliğ işleminin hangi yöntemle, hangi adrese ve kime yapıldığı incelenmelidir.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ASY Legal
ASY Legal
Article

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In Turkey 2026

This article examines the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in Turkey. It considers finality, reciprocity, jurisdiction, public policy, service, documentary requirements, security and the relationship between enforcement permission and actual collection. The discussion distinguishes foreign judgments from arbitral awards and from decisions eligible for a separate administrative registration route.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Inheritance Fraud Lawsuits: Legal Nature, Requirements, And Litigation Process

Inheritance fraud (muris muvazaası) is one of the most common inheritance-related disputes in Turkish legal practice. It typically arises when a deceased person (the decedent) transfers real property to one heir by disguising what is, in reality, a gratuitous transfer (gift) as a sale or a contract of maintenance until death, with the intention of depriving the remaining heirs of their inheritance rights. Although such transactions appear legally valid on their face, they do not reflect the parties' true intentions and are therefore evaluated under the legal principles governing sham transactions (muvazaa).
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office