Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JUNE 2020

Turkish Average Consumers: Healthcare Professionals Or End Users?

Gün + Partners
Gün + Partners
Contributor
Gün + Partners

Gün + Partners

We are one of the oldest and largest law firms in Turkey and are considered internationally to be...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gün + Partners

In December 2019, the Court of Appeal issued two decisions in which the nature of consumers has been scrutinized while assessing likelihood of confusion between pharmaceutical trade marks.

TurkeyIntellectual Property

In December 2019, the Court of Appeal issued two decisions in which the nature of consumers has been scrutinized while assessing likelihood of confusion between pharmaceutical trade marks.

Infantum v Infanta

A trade mark application INFANTUM was filed before the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (the Office) covering goods in classes 3 and 5, against which an opposition was filed based on the prior registered trade mark INFANTA covering the same classes.The opposition was accepted in its entirety by the Office based on the likelihood of confusion.

The applicant filed an action for the cancellation of the Office's final decision by arguing that there is no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks since the target consumers of the medical goods should be considered as well- informed and highly educated.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from