Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2017

The New Industrial Property Law Numbered 6769

Pekin Bayar Mizrahi (in alliance with Norton Rose Fulbright)
Explore more from Pekin Bayar Mizrahi (in alliance with Norton Rose Fulbright)

The Industrial Property Law Numbered 6769 (the "Industrial Property Law"), which was adopted by the Grand National Assembly of Turkey on December 22, 2016, was published in the Official Gazette...

TurkeyIntellectual Property
S. Asli Kucuroğlu Alkan
S. Asli Kucuroğlu Alkan
Author LinkedIn connections

The Industrial Property Law Numbered 6769 (the "Industrial Property Law"), which was adopted by the Grand National Assembly of Turkey on December 22, 2016, was published in the Official Gazette on January 10, 2017 and entered into force as of January 10, 2017.

As a result of the entry into force of the Industrial Property Law, the Decree-Law No. 556 Pertaining to the Protection of Trademarks, the Decree-Law No. 551 Pertaining to the Protection of Patent Rights, the Decree-Law No. 554 Pertaining to the Protection of Industrial Designs and the Decree-Law No. 555 on the Protection of Geographical Indications which were regulating the registration and protection of trademarks, patents, industrial designs and geographical indications before the entry into force of the Industrial Property Law, were abolished.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Intellectual Property Protection In Turkey 2026

This article examines the protection of patents, utility models, designs, copyright and related commercial interests in Turkey. It considers territorial protection, filing routes, ownership, employee and commissioned works, licences, infringement, interim remedies, customs measures and the evidence needed for enforcement. The judicial authorities cited in the text illustrate the importance of identifying the particular right and the person entitled to enforce it.
TurkeyIntellectual Property
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Contractual Protection Of Trade Secrets And Confidential Information: Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) In Light Of Turkish Law Of Obligations And Court Of Cassation Jurisprudence

In the global economic order, as information has become a more strategic form of capital than tangible assets, the legal mechanisms designed to protect it have necessarily evolved. Non-Disclosure Agreements ("NDAs") function as the legal safeguard of trust at every level of the commercial ecosystem, from a simple business meeting to multi-billion-dollar mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") transactions.
TurkeyIntellectual Property
Fidanci & Esin Partners
Fidanci & Esin Partners
Article

Intellectual Property Protection In Mobile Games: Where Does Inspiration End And Infringement Begin?

Türkiye has established itself as one of the leading players in the global mobile gaming industry. According to various industry reports, the Turkish mobile gaming market's volume surpassed USD 1 billion in 2025[NF1.1], while Turkish-based [NF2.1]studios such as Peak Games, Gram Games, Rollic Games and Dream Games have achieved remarkable international success. As the industry continues to expand, so do the legal questions surrounding the creation, commercialisation and protection of mobile games.
TurkeyIntellectual Property
Ozdirekcan Dundar Senocak Ak Avukatlik Ortakligi
Ozdirekcan Dundar Senocak Ak Avukatlik Ortakligi
Article

The Silent Crisis In Trademark Law: Inconsistencies In Actions For The Cancellation Of Higher Board Decisions

Actions brought against decisions rendered by the Re-Examination and Evaluation Board (“Higher Board”) concerning trademark applications constitute an important part of Turkish trademark law practice. In practice, particularly in actions brought following the refusal of an opposition filed by the owner of an earlier trademark, it is common for plaintiffs to seek not only the cancellation of the Higher Board decision but also the invalidation of the trademark at issue if it is registered during the proceedings.
TurkeyIntellectual Property
Gün + Partners
Gün + Partners