Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MAY 2025

The ELECTRIC PLAYGROUND Case: A Controversial Approach To Descriptiveness And Distinctiveness

Gün + Partners
Gün + Partners
Contributor
Gün + Partners

Gün + Partners

We are one of the oldest and largest law firms in Turkey and are considered internationally to be...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gün + Partners

A recent IP case has evaluated the descriptiveness and distinctive character of English-language word marks with respect to Turkish consumers

TurkeyIntellectual Property
  • ELECTRIC PLAYGROUND was found descriptive and devoid of distinctiveness in Türkiye, but was registered as a trademark for the same services in the US
  • The approach adopted by the Turkish IP Office and courts was arguably excessive and disproportionate
  • The application was refused for sports, culture and entertainment services in Class 41

A recent IP case has evaluated the descriptiveness and distinctive character of English-language word marks with respect to Turkish consumers

Background

The plaintiff applied to the Turkish IP Office to register the following mark in Class 41:

1629804a.jpg

The application was partially refused for sports, culture and entertainment services in Class 41 due to its descriptiveness and lack of distinctive character. Further to the applicant's appeal, the Higher Board within the IP Office sustained the partial provisional refusal.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from