Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 SEPTEMBER 2024

Case Analysis: Kasımlar Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP) Case: Contract Interpretation, Causality, Betterment, And Foreign Currency Prohibition

Baysal & Demir
Baysal & Demir
Contributor
Baysal & Demir

Baysal & Demir

Baysal & Demir is an international law firm committed to excellence. The firm was founded by senior...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baysal & Demir

Kasımlar Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP), that was planned in 2012 amid debates about its potential damage to the environment and tourism economy, continued to remain a topic of discussion even after becoming operational in 2016.

TurkeyInsurance

Kasımlar Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP), that was planned in 2012 amid debates about its potential damage to the environment and tourism economy, continued to remain a topic of discussion even after becoming operational in 2016. After being hit by a severe landslide in 2019, the HPP was able to recover only a small portion of its damages from its insurer Thus, it initiated arbitration proceedings before the Insurance Arbitration Commission for the remaining damages, which amounted to 7.5 million US dollars (USD). The claimant's case involves approximately 3 million USD in 'repair, recovery, and prevention' costs, as well as around 4.5 million USD in lost profits.

The primary reason the insurer rejected this claim was the "repair" costs were intended to correct errors made during the design and construction phases of the power plant, which was essentially serving the purpose of "improving the insured value". Similarly, the recovery and prevention' costs following the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from