VAT-registered businesses in Thailand face a recurring problem: input VAT claims are rejected when suppliers fail to remit collected taxes, leaving good-faith buyers liable for additional assessments, surcharges, and penalties. Tax specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins examine recent Supreme Court rulings, the evidentiary burdens placed on taxpayers, and practical strategies for building dispute-ready supplier documentation.
Every month, VAT-registered businesses calculate output and input VAT and file a VAT return (Form Phor.Phor.30) to pay the net VAT due or to claim a refund. A recurring and costly dispute arises where a business has paid input VAT to its supplier, only to have that input VAT rejected on the grounds that the tax invoice was issued by “a person not entitled to issue tax invoices.” This article explains how the Revenue Department and the courts approach these disputes, what evidence a taxpayer should prepare to withstand scrutiny—including in online and remote transactions—and why a digital economy calls for faster detection of suppliers who issue invoices but fail to remit the VAT they collect.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
View source