Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 DECEMBER 2020

Booking.com: An Example Of Domain Name Marks Acquiring Distinctiveness In Thailand

Tilleke & Gibbins
Tilleke & Gibbins
Contributor
Tilleke & Gibbins

Tilleke & Gibbins

Tilleke & Gibbins has been present in Vietnam since 1992, when it became the first foreign law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Tilleke & Gibbins

Trademarks that consist of a combination of a generic word and a top-level domain name, such as ".com," are usually regarded as not registrable by trademark registrars.

ThailandIntellectual Property

Trademarks that consist of a combination of a generic word and a top-level domain name, such as ".com," are usually regarded as not registrable by trademark registrars. However, recent cases in the United States and in Thailand have proved that this premise is not always valid. In some instances, the combination of a generic word and a domain name only make the mark descriptive, but such a mark may still be registrable if the applicant can prove that it has achieved secondary meaning in that jurisdiction.

In late June 2020, in Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V., 591 U.S. (2020), the Supreme Court of the United States decided in favor of Booking.com, one of the world's leading digital travel companies, and rejected the United States Patent and Trademark Office's argument regarding the generic nature of the mark. In the judgment, Justice Ginsburg determined that consumers do not in fact perceive the term "Booking.com" as a generic name and that the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from