Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2024

Retrocessions And Execution-Only – Validity Of A Waiver

Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd
Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd
Contributor
Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

We are a leading Swiss business law firm with offices in Zurich, Geneva and Singapore. We take care...

View firm profile
Explore more from Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

In a new decision 4A 574/2023, 4A 576/2023, dated 24 May 2024 and published on 26 June 2024, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court confirms and specifies the validity of a waiver clause...

SwitzerlandWealth Management

In a new decision 4A 574/2023, 4A 576/2023, dated 24 May 2024 and published on 26 June 2024, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court confirms and specifies the validity of a waiver clause in relation with execution-only mandates as well as investment advisory agreements.

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court has previously ruled that, in the context of asset management agreements, a waiver is only valid if the amount of retrocessions in relation to the assets under management is disclosed.

Recently, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court ruled that a waiver indicating the amount of retrocessions in reference to an applicable percentage per class of assets (without reference to the assets under management) was "not insufficient" in case of execution-only mandates (4A_496/2023, dated 27 February 2024).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from