Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 OCTOBER 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Navigating AI With Pestalozzi – Part 5: Intellectual Property

Pestalozzi
Pestalozzi
Contributor
Pestalozzi

Pestalozzi

Pestalozzi is a multicultural Swiss business law firm focusing on high-end work for domestic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Pestalozzi

Using generative AI applications which are trained, fine-tuned, or prompted on IP protected content may infringe third-parties' IP rights and bear liability risks for the user of a generative AI application.

SwitzerlandIntellectual Property

Key Takeaways

  • Using generative AI applications which are trained, fine-tuned, or prompted on IP protected content may infringe third-parties' IP rights and bear liability risks for the user of a generative AI application.
  • Currently, generative AI cannot be the author of a work of art or the inventor of a technical invention.
  • It is unsettled yet to what extent a user of AI applications can be considered the author of a work result generated with a generative AI system based on their prompts. At least in cases in which the AI application is used as a mere tool in an overall process and a human had sufficient influence on the result, the output could potentially be subject to IP protection. For most cases, however, works created with generative AI applications will not be accessible to IP protection.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from