Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 NOVEMBER 2015

The Private Competition Enforcement Review

Prager Dreifuss AG
Prager Dreifuss AG
Contributor
Prager Dreifuss AG

Prager Dreifuss AG

Prager Dreifuss is an independent, full-service law firm with over 37 years of experience in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Prager Dreifuss AG

Civil antitrust litigation remains limited in Switzerland. Since the enactment of the Act on Cartels and Other Restraints of Competition in 1995, only roughly 50 cases are known to have been brought before the civil courts.

SwitzerlandAntitrust/Competition Law

I OVERVIEW OF RECENT PRIVATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION ACTIVITY

Civil antitrust litigation remains limited in Switzerland. Since the enactment of the Act on Cartels and Other Restraints of Competition (the ACart) in 1995, only roughly 50 cases are known to have been brought before the civil courts.2 The bulk in the enforcement of antitrust and competition law largely rests upon the competition authorities. The reasons for this lack of private competition law enforcement are manifold.

First, it seems more appealing for an aggrieved party to file a complaint with the competition authorities, rather than bearing the burden of proof in a civil proceeding. Unlike claimants in private enforcement proceedings who regularly face evidentiary difficulties, the competition authorities may compel the production of evidence. However, if (e.g., for discovery reasons) the claimant opts to file a complaint with the competition authorities, the claimant should be aware that his or her

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from