Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 AUGUST 2017

After The GABA-Decision: The Significance Test In Competition Law

Prager Dreifuss AG
Prager Dreifuss AG
Contributor
Prager Dreifuss AG

Prager Dreifuss AG

Prager Dreifuss is an independent, full-service law firm with over 37 years of experience in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Prager Dreifuss AG

With its decision in the GABA case, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court has given its understanding of the significance test in Article 5 SCA.

SwitzerlandAntitrust/Competition Law

With its decision in the GABA case, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court has given its understanding of the significance test in Article 5 SCA. In the court's view, the element functions as a "de minimis rule" which by and large is to be interpreted the same way as the respective element in Article 101 TFEU ("appreciable effect"). This means in particular that restrictive agreements which the law presumes to be unlawful are generally speaking "appreciable". In the final analysis, the court's decision has rather broad effects: It requires from the Federal Competition Commission (FCC) to completely review its approach to Article 5 SCA (comprising the de minimis-criterion, the efficiency test and the core restrictions, i.e. presumptions). On the whole, this new approach should enhance legal certainty.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from