Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JUNE 2011

Oilwell Gone Wrong

Despite a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal, exchange control approval will still be required in respect of the assignment of intellectual property to a non-resident.

South AfricaTax
Conor McFadden
Conor McFadden

Despite a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal, exchange control approval will still be required in respect of the assignment of intellectual property to a non-resident.

The Supreme Court of Appeal was recently called upon to, in essence, rectify a trade mark register to reflect Oilwell (Pty) Ltd ("Oilwell") as proprietor of the trademark 'Protec' instead of Protec Auto Care Ltd ("Auto Care"), a company incorporated in the United Kingdom.

In 1998 Oilwell and various other parties concluded an assignment agreement in terms of which, inter alia, Oilwell assigned the trade mark 'Protec', to Protec International Ltd ("International") a company incorporated in Guernsey.

As a consequence of relations between the parties to the assignment deteriorating and International running into financial trouble, the trade mark was assigned for a second time to Auto Care by International.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from