Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2026

Validity Of Contracts With The State Being Extended Without A Competitive Tender Process

The KwaZulu-Natal High Court examined whether public transport contracts that had been extended repeatedly without competitive bidding violated constitutional procurement requirements.

South AfricaGovernment, Public Sector

In Sizanani Mazulu Transport (Pty) Ltd and Others v Member for the Executive Council for Transport, KwaZulu-Natal and Others, the KwaZulu-Natal Division of the High Court was called upon to determine the validity of public transport contracts that had been extended repeatedly without a competitive bidding process.

Background

The dispute has its origins in the period between 1997 and 2001, when the KZN Department of Transport (“the Department”) concluded contracts with various bus operators, referred to as the "old order contracts", following a tender process for public transport services. These contracts expired between 2005 and 2007 and were thereafter extended on a month-to-month basis. In 2017, the parties concluded addendums extending the contracts for an interim period of one year, with a view to transitioning to new negotiated contracts or the implementation of the Integrated Public Transport Network.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from