Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2014

Regulation 28 – Is Your Back Covered?

Many pension funds are finding it difficult to stay abreast of the reporting requirements imposed on them by Regulation 28.

South AfricaFinance and Banking
Wayne Pretorius
Wayne Pretorius

Many pension funds are finding it difficult to stay abreast of the reporting requirements imposed on them by Regulation 28.

Inability to source the required information

The level of detail required by the Financial Services Board (FSB) for reporting is not always readily available from asset managers.  This is caused by  a myriad of problems ranging from system constraints at asset manager level to asset managers refusing to provide their clients with the underlying detail, as this could result in their competitors potentially being able to source this information.

The responsibility for monitoring has been misunderstood

We have noted that many pension funds believe that their benefit administrator is responsible for monitoring compliance with Regulation 28. A closer look at many service level agreements has indicated that in many cases, the administration agreement does not include a compliance monitoring function.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from