Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JUNE 2026

Why Most Organisations Underestimate Their Environmental Footprint

Research shows that most organisations capture only a fraction of their environmental footprint, with 75-90% of emissions often sitting within value chains that remain unmeasured. This analysis examines the structural blind spots, data limitations, and governance gaps that cause systematic underestimation of environmental impact, and explores what stronger environmental governance frameworks should look like.

South AfricaEnvironment

Introduction

Most organisations believe they understand their environmental footprint. Carbon emissions are calculated, KPIs are tracked, and environmental disclosures are included in annual or sustainability reports. However, when methodologies and boundaries are examined closely, material gaps often emerge. Underestimation is rarely intentional. It is usually structural.

Research, from CDP and a Boston Consulting Group, of shows that most organisations are only capturing a fraction of their environmental footprint. Studies suggest that 75–90% of a company’s emissions often sit within its value chain, yet only around 38% of businesses currently track these Scope 3 emissions. In some sectors, supply-chain emissions can be up to 26 times higher than direct operational emissions, highlighting how easily environmental impact can be underestimated when measurement boundaries remain narrow.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from