Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 SEPTEMBER 2016

Implied Covenants In Leases

The case of Overseas Union Enterprise Ltd v Three Sixty Degree Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 71 is instructive in the law regarding leases, setting out the principles a court would adopt when interpreting a lease.

SingaporeReal Estate and Construction

The case of Overseas Union Enterprise Ltd v Three Sixty Degree Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 71 ("OUE") is instructive in the law regarding leases, setting out the principles a court would adopt when interpreting a lease. The case illustrates how courts would interpret the particular wording of clauses that are prevalent in leases, and helpfully expounds on principles applicable to the implied covenants of quiet enjoyment and non-derogation of grant. In this case note, we focus on these implied covenants and the general principles relating to these covenants that landlords and tenants should bear in mind when entering into leases.

Facts

The plaintiff, Overseas Union Enterprise Ltd (the "Landlord") leased the 39th floor of its hotel ("Level 39") to the defendant, Three Sixty Degree Pte Ltd (the "Tenant") under a lease agreement (the "Lease"). However, due to peculiarities with the leased premises, the Tenant faced difficulties in applying for a fire safety certificate ("FSC

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from