Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MAY 2011

Asia Update - April 2011

Singapore High Court judgment underlines the importance for all those involved in international trade of conducting sufficient due diligence to ensure compliance with the latest international sanctions.

SingaporeInternational Law
Patric McGonigal
Patric McGonigal

The "SAHAND": Iran Sanctions Case1

Singapore High Court judgment underlines the importance for all those involved in international trade of conducting sufficient due diligence to ensure compliance with the latest international sanctions.

In a case involving the arrest of three vessels owned by subsidiary companies of the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), the Singapore High Court has clarified the approach of the Singapore courts to the implementation of recent UN sanctions against Iran.

The vessels were arrested in Singapore waters in connection with an accelerated debt of over US$180 million owed under various English law financing arrangements. The defendant owners applied for the discharge of an order permitting the sale of the vessels on the basis that sums sufficient to cover the debt owed had been received by the claimant's bank. The primary issues raised concerned whether the vessels came within the ambit of various UN sanctions against

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from