Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 AUGUST 2018

Judicial Management – The Effect Of Creditors' Third-Party Security On Their Voting Rights

Bank creditors often take security in the form of guarantees or mortgages given by the borrower's parent or affiliated companies.

SingaporeFinance and Banking

Bank creditors often take security in the form of guarantees or mortgages given by the borrower's parent or affiliated companies. Such creditors enjoy a privileged position vis-à-vis unsecured creditors and there are rules to maintain fairness between these classes of creditors when a borrower in put into liquidation. However, as the recent case of Re Swiber Holdings Ltd shows there was until recently some uncertainty as to the application of such rules in the case of judicial management. The issues were complicated by the fact that, to some extent, the two companies under judicial management were borrower and guarantor. How are the votes of creditors to be counted?

1. When a defaulting borrower is put into liquidation, a bank creditor may generally maintain a proof of debt for the full amount of the debt, notwithstanding the existence of security from a third party. However, what is the position where the defaulting borrower is put under judicial management and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from