Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Townsend & Townsend & Crew’ returned 4 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    U.S. Supreme Court Issues Decision In Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp.

    In another significant set-back for patent plaintiffs, the Supreme Court in Microsoft v. AT&T Corp. held that merely shipping a master disk containing software code to overseas computer manufacturers for copying and installation on new computers is insufficient to create infringement liability for those copies installed on the foreign-manufactured machines.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Townsend & Townsend & Crew
    Townsend & Townsend & Crew
  • Article

    U.S. Supreme Court Issues Decision in KSR Int´l Co. v. Teleflex Inc.

    In a potentially far-reaching decision on patent validity, the Supreme Court held in KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. that the determination of whether the subject matter of a patent claim is obvious is an "expansive and flexible" legal inquiry, and that the Federal Circuit's test requiring a specific "teaching, motivation, or suggestion" to combine prior art references (the so-called "TSM" test) must not be applied rigidly.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Townsend & Townsend & Crew
Townsend & Townsend & Crew
  • Article

    Invention Agreements – Patent Incentives

    (December 9, 2009) Employed inventors are happier with jobs in which they are rewarded for their inventions and are unsatisfied with jobs in which they feel they receive only token recognition.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Townsend & Townsend & Crew
    Townsend & Townsend & Crew
  • Article

    U.S. PTO Issues Final Rules Revising Continuation Practice And Claims Practice

    On August 21, 2007, the PTO published final rules limiting the number of continuation applications and claims. The rules will take effect on November 1, 2007. While the Patent Office says the rules are not retroactive, filing a continuation on or after August 21 can limit the options available. Below is a general summary of the major provisions
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Townsend & Townsend & Crew
    Townsend & Townsend & Crew
  • Showing 1–4 of 4 results

    Legal Intelligence Newsletters