Your search for ‘Clyde & Co’ returned 6,611 results

Court rules that a decision from the FOS is not an arbitral award

Section 70(2) of the Arbitration Act 1996 provides that an award cannot be challenged or appealed if the applicant/appellant has not "first exhausted...

Judge considers whether claim to litigation privilege had been made out.

The Court of Appeal in Woodward and Another v Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Limited [2019] EWCA Civ 985 has unanimously dismissed an appeal against a judgment of the High Court.

Court of Appeal decides whether defendant can extend time to appeal against registration of a foreign judgment

Where there is good reason to suppose that assets held by third parties really belong to the defendant, TSB Private Bank International v Chabra [1992] is authority for the principle...

Court accepts that it can order an unlimited cross-undertaking in damages in return for a freezing order

The worldwide freezing order ("WFO") granted against the respondents contained the standard disclosure obligation to inform the applicant in writing "of all his assets exceeding [here, £25,000]...

Service of court proceedings on states is governed by section 12 of the State Immunity Act 1978. This provides that "Any writ or other document required to be served for instituting

The current litigation landscape for professionals in Hong Kong is relatively benign: but is this the lull before the storm?

After a November 2011 helicopter crash in Hawaii killed four passengers and the pilot, the pilot's widow asserted state tort law claims against the helicopter's owner, Nevada Helicopter Leasing.

The Justice Select Committee intends to hold an inquiry into the Government's proposed whiplash reforms.

The Claimant was the daughter of a British soldier, and as a child, heard the Hyde Park bomb detonate from her nursery.

In this case, Northhampton County Court felt bound to decide that the original acceptance period for a Part 36 offer had expired and was not renewed upon the offer being varied.

Court of Appeal considers committal order issues where defendant is out of the jurisdiction.

Judge considers what needs to be proven to obtain pre-action disclosure and the impact of a limitation defence.

Court of Appeal orders security for costs where ATE insurance policy did not contain an anti-avoidance provision ...