On Friday, May 10 the Federal Court publicly released its decision in the patent impeachment action Aux Sable Liquid Products LP et al. v. JL Energy Transportation

On September 3, 2024, Eli Lilly filed a complaint against the FDA in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana pursuing the latest challenge to the FDA's application of its "biological product" classification.

Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code's "safe harbor" preventing avoidance in bankruptcy of certain securities, commodity, or forward-contract payments has long been a magnet for controversy.

For this reason, the inability of marijuana businesses to open bank accounts has become a growing point of contention between state and federal regulators.

The Ontario Superior Court of Jusice quashed a resolution of Toronto City Council that required the mandatory conversion of all taxi licences to a new taxi licensing regime on the basis that it was illegally passed.

In a commercial lease, the covenant of the tenant to insure the landlord along with itself fixes the tenant with the risk of loss.

For many years the sanctions available for the spoliation of electronically stored information (ESI) were largely similar in both the New York federal and state courts.

The SABS has historically based the computation of IRBs on an after-tax basis. Controversy has arisen under the new SABS as to the deductibility of tax on collateral benefits received.

The Ontario Superior Court's decision in Pascuet v. Sky Service reaffirms that employees cannot delay wrongful dismissal claims by pursuing actions in incorrect jurisdictions or misunderstanding legal responsibility. This ruling clarifies that the two-year limitation period begins at termination, regardless of whether an employee initially files in the wrong court or fails to appreciate the legal significance of their dismissal.

There are a growing number of cases of organizations reporting the loss, mistaken disclosure or theft of personal information collected in the course of commercial activities.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released a significant decision that both expands occupiers' liability for violence on their premises, and affirms a new privacy tort that censures

Four years ago, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Brake v PJ-M2R Restaurant Inc.Despite this decision and the passage of time since...

In November 2022, BMO Bank was hit with the largest verdict in Minnesota history. After a four-week trial, federal jurors handed down a $564 million verdict finding the bank's predecessors aided and abetted Ponzi schemer.

On Nov. 30, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit published a potential watershed decision in U.S. v. Banks,1 holding for the first time that the definition of "loss" in fraud cases...

The Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s SJ of noninfringement, finding that it was based on several erroneous claim constructions.

The appellant, Premium Staffing Ltd., appealed from an order of the motion judge striking a defence of set-off from its statement of defence.

Our laws and legal system have always struggled to keep pace with technology. From cryptocurrency to self-driving cars, legal and regulatory gaps emerge each time technology progresses.

Following are this week's summaries of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of September 4, 2023.

The 32nd annual Federal Procurement Institute (FPI) and Council Meeting for the ABA’s Public Contract Law section were held in Annapolis, Maryland, March 11–13, 2026.

When I started as a litigator in 2001, a technique I call "blind stonewalling" ruled discovery practice everywhere from BigLaw to the smallest boutiques.