Your search for ‘Ernst & Young LLP’ returned 183 results

In a new Global Benchmark Report, ISDA, SIFMA and several other trade associations (collectively, "associations") highlighted that few market participants ...

On August 22, 2016, the Ninth Circuit joined the Seventh Circuit in the split amongst U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal on the issue of enforceability of employment arbitration agreements precluding class actions.

Employers returning from the Memorial Day weekend were on the receiving end of bad news as they learned that the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals became the third federal appeals court to strike down...

The Department of Labor (the "DOL") proposed an amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 80-26 ("PTE 80-26") under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"). PTE 80-26 is a class exemption that permits parties-in-interest with respect to employee benefit plans to make interest-free loans to such plans if certain conditions are met.

Canada (National Revenue) v Atlas Tube Canada ULC1 is the latest in a series of cases considering the ability of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to compel corporate disclosure of confidential reports analyzing the tax positions of a company.

The split between the National Labor Relations Board and federal courts over the enforceability of class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements widened in a January 2014 administrative law judge decision, Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

In a controversial decision that rejects the precedent of numerous federal and state courts, the NLRB has reaffirmed its earlier decision in D.R. Horton, Inc., 357 NLRB No. 184 (2012).

Canada (National Revenue) v Atlas Tube Canada ULC1 is the latest in a series of cases considering the ability of the CRA to compel corporate disclosure of confidential reports analyzing the tax positions of a company.

Class and collective action waivers in arbitration agreements are enforceable under the FAA and not prohibited by the NLRA.

On January 13, 2017, the Supreme Court agreed to take up the contentious class action waiver issue that has riled courts for the past four years.

Two Massachusetts decisions—including one from the state's highest court—applied the same standard regarding enforcement of an agreement to arbitrate.

In Canada (National Revenue) v Atlas Tube Canada ULC, the Federal Court held that Canada Revenue Agency could compel a private corporation to disclose its draft tax due diligence report during the course of an ongoing audit.

In Slack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani,1 the Supreme Court­­ on June 1, 2023, unanimously held that even in a case involving direct listing of both registered and unregistered securities...

In Cider of Sweden Ltd v HMRC (Ernst & Young LLP (Third Party)) [2022] UKFTT 76 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal ("FTT") has issued a significant, but narrow decision regarding third-party access...

The Affordable Care Act is the single most important piece of Federal social legislation in more than a generation.

On April 27, 2010, the US Supreme Court issued a decision that effectively tolled the statute of limitations applicable to securities fraud litigation until plaintiffs discover or reasonably should have discovered sufficient evidence of scienter to plead a fraud claim in conformity with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA), i.e., fraudulent intent.

As applicable large employers grapple with the Affordable Care Act’s employer shared responsibility rules, two questions arise with notable frequency.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals—apparently unable to wait a few months for the Supreme Court of the United States to rule on the issue—has now cast its lot with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)