Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Spruson & Ferguson’ returned 1,285 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Let the petitioner beware: Clearing a path by proactively challenging patents in an IPR may result in a lack of standing to appeal an adverse decision

    This US decision clarified requirements for standing to appeal from an inter partes review (IPR) before the Patent Board.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Amendments to a patent during court proceedings – how much transparency is required?

    The onus to establish that amendment is needed is on the patentee, who must make full disclosure of all relevant matters.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    The CPTPP places IP in the too-hard basket

    The CPTPP (initially the TPP) has resolved to continue to reach agreement, but without certain clauses, such as IP.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    The curious case of IP and the TPPA-11

    The TPPA-11 is what remains of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Free Trade Agreement following the US withdrawal.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Opting out of the Unified Patent Court

    The Unified Patent Court, a new international court for patent litigation, has jurisdiction over several EU countries.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Singapore Patents: Process changes and fee updates in the Intellectual Property (Amendment) Act 2022

    A summary of the key changes in the procedures and fees for filing patent applications in Singapore.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Now effective: new amendments to guidelines for Patent Examination of the China National Intellectual Property Administration

    Update on key content in the amendments to the Guidelines for Patent Examination of CNIPA
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Understanding the annual working statement obligation

    Indonesian Patent Law now requires all patent holders to file an annual statement of patent implementation for every patent that is currently in force.
    IndonesiaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Australian innovation patent system to be abolished by legislation now passed in Federal Parliament

    "Abolish" may be too strong to describe the changes - the innovation patent system will be "phased out" over a few years.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Trademarks: IDR 3.5 trillion dispute behind the Sushi Tei Indonesia restaurant brand

    The judge agreed that the defendant's actions to attach the SUSHI TEI brand infringed the plaintiff's exclusive rights.
    IndonesiaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Publication of Patent Applications

    A patent applicant must provide a complete description in their patent specification of how his or her invention is put into practice. During the patent application process, the patent specification is made available to the public by being published. In most countries, publication of a patent application usually takes place 18 months from the earliest date that an application was first filed for the invention. Singapore has a similar provision.
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
  • Article

    Restrictions on Filing Foreign Patent Applications for Singapore Residents

    Singapore residents must file a patent application in Singapore first or obtain permission from the Registrar of Patents before proceeding to file a foreign patent application first. This provision does not apply to patent applications first filed outside Singapore by a person resident outside Singapore.
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
  • Article

    Singapore’s Strategy for Creation, Ownership, Protection and Exploitation of IP

    The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) introduced a national standard of a management and auditing tool named <U>S</U>trategies for <U>C</U>reation, <U>O</U>wnership, <U>P</U>rotection and <U>E</U>xploitation of <U>I</U>ntellectual <U>P</U>roperty, or "SCOPE-IP". In our technology driven world, intellectual property ("IP") plays a critical role and successful companies recognise the importance of performing due diligence so as to aggressively exploit their IPs to full potential.
    SingaporeStrategy
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
  • Article

    China update: Orange book-type patent register established as trial version: A start into the new patent linkage system

    This register is a preliminary version for public comment, but the final database is not expected to be much different.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    No shade, but the evidence was slim | Eminem suffers first loss in trade mark saga

    An Australian small business has struck the first blow in a multi-stage trade mark dispute with the artist Eminem. The case highlights Australia's strict requirements for authorised trade mark use, ownership, control and licensing, with implications for overseas brand owners.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    AusPat Beefs Up ... Would You Like Full Text With That?

    AusPat is IPAustralia’s online searching system for patent information, and was developed to provide an integrated solution for Australian patent searching.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Brand Protection And Criminal Offences

    What can brand owners do to combat counterfeiters in Australia?
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Business Method Bonanza in Canada

    Hot on the heels of the US Supreme Court ruling in Bilski, the Canadians have jumped back on the business method bandwagon.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Director's Cut - Director Found Personally Liable In Patent Infringement

    The Federal Court of Australia recently found a company director personally liable for patent infringement. The facts of the case and the salient points considered by the Court in reaching this finding are discussed below.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Draft Guidelines For Examining Software Patents Under New Zealand's New Patents Act

    In August 2010 [http://www.shelstonip.com/news_story.asp?m=8&y=2010&nsid=153], we reported that the latest iteration of New Zealand's new Patents Act purported to now exclude computer software from patentability.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Showing 621–640 of 1285 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics