Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.’ returned 1,717 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Which One Of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was Reversed?

    So far this year, the TTAB has affirmed 177 of the 190 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal (about 93%).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    USPTO Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Can Terminate Patents

    The USPTO on May 10, 2024, issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) raising the requirements for accepting a Terminal Disclaimer (TD) to obviate obviousness-type double patenting (ODP).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Article

WYHA? TTAB Affirms Two Refusals To Register Based On Insufficient Specimens

Last week, the Board affirmed two Section 1 and 45 refusals to register on the ground that the respective specimens were unacceptable for registration.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Precedential No. 20: TTAB Forgives Party For Untimeliness Of Discovery Requests Under New Board Rules

    Addressing the revised TTAB Rules that came into effect on January 14, 2017, the Board found that the petitioner had served its discovery requests too late.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTAB Test: Are Cigars Related To Alcoholic Beverages For Section 2(d) Purposes?

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark TERNURA for cigars, finding it likely to cause confusion with the identical mark registered for "liquor; tequila; vodka; wines."
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is BEST KNIGHT GAMES Merely Descriptive Of Board Games?

    The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark BEST KNIGHT GAMES for "board games; card games; checkers games; chess games; dice games; equipment sold as a unit for playing board games...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Pro Se Intent-to-Use Applicant Wins TTAB Priority Battle In Section 2(d) Opposition To DRIPHOUSE CLOTHING & Design

    Another pro se applicant successfully fended off a Section 2(d) opposition, this time despite filing no evidence, testimony or briefs.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTAB Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Oppositions Turn Out?

    Here are three recent Board decisions in Section 2(d) oppositions. I'm not giving any hints this time, so you're on your own.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms TTAB: BREW SCIENCE Merely Descriptive Of Videos About Beer, Beer Accessories, And The Beer Industry

    [This guest post was written by Kira-Khanh McCarthy, a law clerk (soon-to-be associate) in the Trademark Group at Wolf...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Fourth Circuit Returns Long-Running FLANAX Case To E.D. Virginia On Laches, Statute Of Limitations, And Tolling Issues

    After fourteen (14) years of litigation at the TTAB and in the courts, the battle between Bayer and Belmora over the mark FLANAX continues.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms TTAB Entry Of Judgment As Sanction For Failure To Comply With Discovery Orders

    In a nonprecedential decision, the CAFC affirmed the TTAB's entry of judgment against Respondent Kris Kaszuba...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Foundational Medicine Review Confusable With Foundation Medicine For Medical Publications, Says TTAB

    The Board sustained this opposition to registration of FOUNDATIONAL MEDICINE REVIEW for "journals in the field of medicine" and "providing on-line non-downloadable articles...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Precedential No. 35: TTAB Dismisses Appeal Because Applicant Did Not Address Drawing And Color Requirements

    The USPTO refused to register the mark shown below, for "vodka," based on the applicant's failure to comply with a drawing requirement and its failure to amend the color claim in the application.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Which Of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed?

    The TTAB recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals summarized below.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?

    The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    So far in 2022, the Board has considered 26 appeals from Section 2(d) refusals and has affirmed the refusal in every case. Here are the latest three appeals.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    It's Friday, so here's your weekly/weakly TTABlog Test. So far in 2022, by my reckoning, the Board has affirmed 52 out of 53 Section 2(d) refusals.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    A TTAB judge once told me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time by looking just at the marks and the goods. Here are three more Section 2(d) appeals...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    So far this year, the Board has affirmed 107 of the 112 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal. How do you think these three appeals came out? [Results in first comment].
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    So far this year, the Board has affirmed 135 of the 144 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal (just about 94%). Here are three decisions that came down late last week. How do you think they came out? [Results in first comment].
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Showing 601–620 of 1717 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics