The Bombay High Court in a recent decision in Alice Realties Pvt. Ltd. v/s State of Maharashtra and Others observed that in the event of a mere transfer of a tenancy...

Recently, the Supreme Court of India in its judgment dated 6th February, 2019 in the matter Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar [Criminal Appeal Nos. 230-231 of 2019 in SLP (Criminal) Nos. 9334-35 of 2018] ...

The Supreme Court of India in its decision in Saurashtra Chemicals Ltd. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., [Civil Appeal No. 2059 of 2015] held that if the insurer has not taken delay in intimation on the part of the insured ...

The Supreme Court of India in a recent decision in IDBI Bank Vs Ramswaroop Daliya and Ors., held that the period to deposit the balance sale consideration, as provided under the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, was not sacrosanct ...

The Delhi High Court in its decision in Kulbhushan Sachdev Vs ICICI Bank and Anr. , inter alia observed the limitation period for filing a suit for recovery by a bank would be computed from the date on which...

The Supreme Court in its decision in M/s Vaishno Enterprises v. Hamilton Medical AG & Anr. , observed that the jurisdiction of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Council...

The Delhi High Court in a recent decision in Kapil Goel v. Ram Dulare Yadav observed that consent of the Plaintiff for institution of Pre Mediation Proceedings under Section 12A...

The Delhi High Court in a recent decision in Atmastco Ltd. Vs Mandeep Kalra, held that a dispute between a lawyer and his client where the former was seeking recovery of professional fees, could not be held to be a ‘commercial dispute' withing the meaning of Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

The car was insured with the Respondent No. 1-insurer.

The Bombay High Court in its decision in Saravana Prasad vs. Endemol India Private Limited & Anr with Innovative Film Academy Pvt. Ltd. vs. Endemol Indi Private Limited & Anr., inter alia held that Section 2(62) of the Companies Act, 2013, defines a One Person Company as a company which has only one person as a member.

The said Agreements required Cethar to furnish an advance as well as performance bank guarantees.

The Apex Court further observed that a relief cannot be got indirectly which otherwise could not have been got in a suit for substantive relief.

The Bombay High Court in the decision of Subhash Amolakchand Gandhi Vs Superintendent, Mumbai City survey and Land Records and Anr., inter alia held that in respect of any voidable transaction, a person claiming adverse title or interest in a property ...

The court observed that the High Court should examine whether there is a strong possibility of conviction or not.

The failure of a builder to obtain an occupation certificate amounts to a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Delhi High Court in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-11 Vs Ms. Sangeeta Jain, held that a sale deed primarily reflects a transaction between the parties and the terms of sale, but it does not, in itself, verify the land's classification as agricultural for the taxation purposes.

The Apex Court in its recent decision in Sunil Todi and Ors. vs State of Gujarat and Anr. held that merely labelling a cheque as a security would not obviate its character as an instrument designed to meet a legally enforceable debt or liability.

The Delhi High Court in its decision in M/s KLA Const. Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s Gulshan Homz Private Limited inter alia held that the designation of a seat of arbitration carries with it exclusive supervisory jurisdiction...

The High Court of New Delhi in its recent decision in Ambrosia Corner House Private Limited v. Hangro S Foods held that while considering whether a filing should be considered 'non-est'...

Recently, the Government of Maharashtra made an announcement which reiterated the position under Muhammadan law that a Muhammadan may gift immovable property without registration of such gift.