Your search for ‘Beck Greener’ returned 68 results

Patents provide protection for inventions, and in particular provide a right to prevent third parties making, using, selling, or otherwise commercially exploiting the invention which is defined by the claims of the patent.

The issue of whether or not the use of a registered trade mark in a comparative advertisement is an infringement really shouldn’t be as vexed as it is.

The European patent system is shortly to undergo its biggest change in 40 years, with the launch of the Unitary Patent Package (UPP).

In the last few weeks the House of Lords has given its judgement as to what a product claim needs in order to be sufficient. Both the Court of Appeal and the High Court have refused to excuse patentees for failing to pay renewal fees in time, with the consequence that the patents were terminated.

In October 2007, Mann J found European patent (UK) No. 0577094 to be both valid and infringed. In this appeal there was no challenge to the decision on validity but the question as to whether the patent had been infringed was appealed.