Your search for ‘Vaish Associates Advocates’ returned 930 results

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a recent judgment dated 9th April 2019, passed in the case of P. Leelavathi (D) by L.R.s vs. V. Shankarnarayana Rao (D) by L.R.s bearing Civil Appeal No. 1099 of 2008, ...

Under PMLA, a person is required to give truthful statement if such person is summoned by the Director.

In this edition, we have analyzed the recent decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of General Motors Company USA, affirming the eligibility of US based Limited Liability Companies to avail benefits under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.

Soon after the humiliating defeat faced by Intel in the Karnataka High Court in August, 2022 whereby the largest Chipmaker lost its challenge to the Antitrust probe...

In criminal cases, when a company is made an accused, the company, being a juristic person, authorizes a representative to represent the company before the Court.

Finecure Pharmaceuticals adopted the mark "PANTOPACID" in 2007 for a competing Pantoprazole formulation and applied to register it in April 2009, claiming a portmanteau origin ("PANTO" + "P" for Proton Pump Inhibitor + "ACID"). Sun Pharma opposed this application in October 2010, and the opposition remains pending.

This ends the uncertainty over the business model being used by India's biggest ecommerce companies which has been challenged in court by brick-and-mortar stores.

A new revamped website has also been launched to offer applicants seamless services under FCRA with adequate ease and facilitation.

In the matter of India Resurgence ARC Private Limited v. M/s Amit Metaliks Limited & Another [Civil Appeal No. 1700 of 2021] decided on May 13, 2021 the Supreme Court held that a dissenting secured creditor cannot challenge ...

Recently, the States of Karnataka, Kerala and others preferred an appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India against the judgments of respective High Courts holding that the State Legislatures had no legislative...

The Supreme Court, by a judgment pronounced on May 4, 2023, in the matter of Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and Others v. Mr. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian and Another [Civil Appeal No. 3606 of 2020]...

The first and the foremost point to be noted for protection of a trademark in India is that the "Registration" of a trademark under the (Indian) Trade Marks Act.

Section 145 of the Income tax Act, 1961, as amended by the Finance Act, 1995, empowered the Central Government to notify the Accounting Standards to be followed for computing income under the head "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession" and "Income from Other Sources".

The two member bench of the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana in the case of CHD Developers Limited, Karnal vs. State of Haryana and others, has vide its order dated 22nd April 2015.

In a recent turnaround from an approval granted earlier vide its order dated 28 November 2019 ( "approval order") to the now famous Amazon-Future Group deal, India's fair market watchdog...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, vide judgement dated 05.03.2020, has upheld the order dated 03.07.2014 passed by the Competition Commission of India for abuse of dominant position by M/s Adani Gas Limited.

In the intricate tapestry of legal terminology, the concept of a "continuing offense" emerges as a significant thread. It encapsulates the essence of offenses that transcend single acts or moments...