Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Spruson & Ferguson’ returned 1,284 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    New rules to sanction trade mark filing irregularities in China

    The 19 specific provisions in SAMR Decree No.17 aim to regulate trade mark filing activities from four major aspects.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New Zealand Update: Patent fees on the increase, but are they excess-ively complex?

    This article discusses upcoming changes, and differences between earlier proposed fees and those approved by government.
    New ZealandIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Article

World IP Day – reaching for gold – an interview with elite athlete and patent attorney, Allira Hudson-Gofers

Article records an interview with elite athlete & patent attorney about how innovation has played a part in sport & much more.
AustraliaIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    TGA proposes far-reaching changes to support the repurposing of prescription medicines

    Explanation of repurposing medicines & the 3 broad approaches outlined by TGA to encourage it.
    AustraliaFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    TGA transparency reforms (part 2): Early publication of major innovator prescription medicine applications

    Focus on earlier publication of major innovator prescription medicine applications.
    AustraliaFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    ACIP Report on Patentable Subject Matter issued 16 February 2011

    Following the 2004 Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) report on gene patenting and human health in which it was reported that the key concept of patentable subject matter in Australia was ambiguous and obscure, the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research asked the Advisory Council on Intellectual Property (ACIP) to conduct a review into the appropriateness and adequacy of the manner of manufacture test.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Australia: Is an international trade mark application right for you?

    Advantages and disadvantages of the 2 options that are available to protect a trade mark in foreign countries.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Australia Update: Get your intellectual property contracts CCA-compliant by 13 September 2019

    Businesses should review their IP contracts to avoid penalties for breach of the competition law provisions of the CCA.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Australia Update: Swole OClock wins its trade mark battle against time

    As demonstrated, any party that relies on the court's discretion for an extension of time should exercise caution.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Australian best method requirement in patent specifications bares its teeth again!

    Attorneys drafting patent specifications for prosecution in Australia, must understand the best method requirements.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Brexit: European trade marks – possibility of no deal

    Some guidance on how trade mark rights will be affected if a deal is not reached between the UK and the EU.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Changes to ACCC guidelines: Get your intellectual property contracts compliant now

    Article advises that the ACCC guidelines will be required reading for anyone involved in IP licensing in Australia.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Changes to .au domain name rules – implications for Australian trade mark owners

    The new rules introduce several changes to the previous eligibility rules applying to .au domain names.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Diagnostic methods in Australia

    Recent FC decision confirms that diagnostic methods are patentable subject-matter in Australia.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Disclose the best method of performing your invention or face the prospect of patent revocation

    This decision puts Australian patentees on notice to include the best method known to them of performing an invention.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Does the law recognise the 'confidential information' contained in a database?

    The right to enforce a duty of confidence is recognised in major common law jurisdictions with similar pre-conditions.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Full Court Gives Pro-Patent Verdict

    In a recent decision, the Full Federal Court presided over the next instalment in the long running dispute between Stena and Austal Ships regarding multi-hulled vessels.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Genesis Of Confusion In Business Method Patents Decision

    On 18 July, 2006, the full court of the Australian Federal Court, in Grant v. Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCAFC 120 made a significant pronouncement likely to add substantial confusion to the borders of possible business method patent protection in Australia.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Hop aboard the bullet train to Japanese patent numbering

    Article provides guidance of the Japanese patent numbering system & what you need in order to locate older Japanese publications.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Howden Australia Pty Ltd v Minetek Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 981: alleged breach of confidential information

    There was no evidence that the plaintiff had taken information with him when he left the first applicant's employment.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Showing 481–500 of 1284 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics