Your search for ‘Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP’ returned 1,078 results

Airbus Helicopters, Inc. v. Riggs arose out of a 2018 helicopter crash in the Grand Canyon.

New Yorkers are set to pick their first new Mayor in 12 years this November and the field of contenders, which includes the Speaker of the City Council, is wide open.

The Eastern District of Pennsylvania's recent decision in Datascope Analytics, LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. provides potential class action defendants one way to avoid class litigation if they can act early to settle claims after receiving a pre-complaint demand from an unhappy consumer.

In November 2012, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York preliminarily approved a settlement agreement in the In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation.

Trial lawyers know that when they want to introduce an out-of-court statement and no obvious exception to the rule against hearsay applies, they always have a fallback position: contend that the statement is not sought to be admitted to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

Plaintiffs alleged that An's death from pulmonary fibrosis was due to her long-term and frequent use of the cleaning agent.

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act prohibits the use of automated dialing systems to call cell phones without the consent of the "called party."

Last November, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced a new enforcement policy.

Employers covered by New York City's Earned Sick Leave Act will be expected to comply with new requirements and will be subject to a re-interpretation of parts of this law when newly published regulations take effect on March 4.

In Dugan v. Best Buy, an unreported decision (thus far) by the New Jersey Appellate court, we are again reminded of the requirement that an employee's waiver of the right to sue contained in an employee-employer arbitration agreement must be clear and unambiguous, and any waiver that falls short of this exacting standard will not be enforced under New Jersey law.

The Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Knight v. Springfield Hyundai is notable for two reasons.

On Oct. 20, the Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee approved a plan to amend the state's constitution to create a merit-selection process for the appointment of appellate judges.

Congress created an uproar among personal injury tort defendants and their insurers when it passed the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (MMSEA) less than 10 years ago.

The Third Circuit recently reaffirmed its authority to hear appeals from district court interlocutory orders that grant prospective equitable relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), even where injunctive relief had not expressly been sought. <em>Ramara, Inc. v. Westfield Ins. Co.</em>, 814 F.3d 660 (3d Cir. 2016).

Tammy Sue Spears and her husband Robert Spears, residents of Idaho, commenced litigation against American Airlines in the District of Utah for personal injuries Mrs. Spears allegedly sustained...

In Fuentes v. Classica Cruise Operator Ltd., plaintiff alleged that a co-passenger attacked him, causing him to suffer injuries while disembarking from an international cruise.

As the world recovers from the Covid-19 crisis, many pressing business disputes – whether local, national, or international – must be resolved in a fair and timely manner outside of traditional...